WITNESS TO STEVE GREEN'S UNFAIR ELECTIONEERING PASSES POLYGRAPH EXAM
(Note: the identity of the witness has only been disclosed to prosecuting authorities. The individual participated
in the examination with the promise of anonymity because supporters of Steve Green have been known to demonstrate violence
and retaliation.)
On March 4, '09, New Mexico Licensed Polygrapher, Kathy Fuller of Las Cruces, administered a two hour examination of
a person said to have been a witness regarding events at the Democratic Presidential Preference Caucus Election held Feb.
5, '08 in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. During the pretest interview, various background questions were asked in
order to determine the person's suitability to take a polygraph examination. No disqualifying conditions were determined,
and the person was deemed suitable to undergo the examination.
The polygraph utilized a zone of comparison technique with the following questions asked, along with other relevant,
irrelevant and control type questions.
1. Did you hear Steve Green say he was running for City Commissioner, along with some others, in an upcoming municipal
election while he was working at the Democratic Caucus?
ANSWER: Yes
2. Did you see that Steven Green's name badge was different from the other poll workers in that his name was printed
with green ink inside of a green box?
ANSWER: Yes
3. Did you see Steve Green's truck parked on a city street near the polling place for the Democratic Caucus
with several political signs attached advertising his bid for City Commissioner?
ANSWER: Yes
Outcome scores of -6 or less are indicative of deception; scores of -5 to +5 are inconclusive; scores of +6 or higher
are indicative of truthfulness. The examinee's polygram score was +20 which is indictative of truthfulness. Additionally,
the polygraph automated scoring system resulted in the following outcome: NO DECEPTION INDICATED with a probability of deception
of less than 1%. And after analysis by the Licensed Polygrapher, the final call was: No Deception Indicated.
In the opinion of the Polygrapher, the examinee was truthful.
